wp-paginate
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home5/californ/california-labor-law-attorney.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114updraftplus
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home5/californ/california-labor-law-attorney.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114wordpress-seo
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home5/californ/california-labor-law-attorney.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Henshaw and Souza v Home Depot USA Inc. is a California class action alleging that not all accrued vacation time was paid out upon termination of employment. Henshaw stated that Home Depot only paid him 184 of his 528 accrued hours of vacation; and Mr. Souza stated that Home Depot only gave him 544 of his 1210 accrued hours of vacation.<\/p>\n
This law suit was originally filed in August of 2010 in the California Superior court, but was later removed to federal court in Sept of 2010. The employees alleged that Home Depot’s vacation policy allowed the employees to accrue vacation time and to roll over any unused vacation time to the next year without limits. The issue arose when Home Depot failed to pay out all of the unused vacation time that had accrued over the years. Henshaw and Souza v Home Depot USA Inc. is a California class action alleging that not all accrued vacation time […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[52,935],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-726","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-overtime","category-vacation-pay"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
\nThe motion seeking preliminary approval of the settlement was filed in the US District court for the Central District of California and stated that the ex-employees are to receive compensation for the unpaid vacation time, \u201cas well as additional payment for interest and waiting time penalties.\u201d The class was certified to include roughly 1300 former Home Depot employees terminated since August of 2006.
\nAs predicted by the plaintiffs, Home Depot has agreed to pay out $1.6 million to settle the class action. But Despite agreeing to settle in mediation, Home Depot maintains that they had no part in any wrong doing and are not accepting any liability for the claims.
\nLabor law is complex; if you have any questions regarding your employment it is recommended that you contact United Employees Law Group.<\/strong><\/a> We can help you understand your rights, and in many cases will review your situation without charge.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"