There has been a lot of buzz over employers requiring that their employees allow the company access to their Facebook page as part of the hiring process. Facebook has recently issued a statement on this practice.<\/p>\n

Erin Egan, Facebook\u2019s chief privacy officer and former Covington and Burling attorney, issued a statement urging both public and private employers not to participate in these practices. She offers\u00a0her legal reasoning<\/a>\u00a0as follows:<\/p>\n

“We don\u2019t think employers should be asking prospective employees to provide their passwords because we don\u2019t think it\u2019s the right thing to do. But it also may cause problems for the employers that they are not anticipating. For example, if an employer sees on Facebook that someone is a member of a protected group (e.g. over a certain age, etc.) that employer may open themselves up to claims of discrimination if they don\u2019t hire that person.” “It also potentially exposes the employer who seeks this access to unanticipated legal liability.”
\n“Employers also may not have the proper policies and training for reviewers to handle private information. If they don\u2019t\u2014and actually, even if they do–the employer may assume liability for the protection of the information they have seen or for knowing what responsibilities may arise based on different types of information (e.g. if the information suggests the commission of a crime).”<\/p>\n

Granted, Egan might not be a California employment attorney and therefore not the most qualified to give advice to employers on what they should and shouldn\u2019t do. She is correct to state that participating in this practice is definitely subject to be challenged. Egan\u2019s statement was directed nationally so she did not address California\u2019s Constitution’s Privacy Protections.<\/p>\n

California\u2019s Constitution’s Privacy Protections, Article I, Section I\u00a0<\/a>of the California Constitution provides: “All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.”<\/p>\n

The California Supreme Court has held that to determine whether an individual’s constitutional right of privacy has been violated, the court must balance the compelling need for the information against the reasonable expectation of privacy the person has in the information. It will be difficult for most employers (other than perhaps those hiring for national security or other related positions where they are exposed to extremely sensitive information), or any college, to demonstrate a compelling or strong need for this information. Employers have been hiring employees without detailed personal information for hundreds of years. In most cases, it will be extremely difficult for an employer to demonstrate a new and sudden compelling need to get behind an applicant’s Facebook password to be able to evaluate that individual.<\/p>\n

Basically, Egan\u2019s statement that requiring this information may leave the employer vulnerable to a lawsuit is quite accurate and increasingly risky if you are a California employee.<\/p>\n

Labor law is complex; if you have any questions regarding your employment it is recommended that you contact a\u00a0California labor law attorney<\/a>\u00a0who can help you understand your rights, and in many cases will review your situation without charge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There has been a lot of buzz over employers requiring that their employees allow the company access to their Facebook […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[825],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2397","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-privacy-protections"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n