U.S. Supreme Court Upholds California Employer’s Search of Employee’s Text Messages<\/strong><\/p>\n

On June 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in the case of\u00a0<\/span>City of Ontario v. Quon<\/span><\/a>\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>holding that a\u00a0<\/span>California Ontario police department<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span>did not violate the\u00a0<\/span>Fourth Amendment\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/a>when it searched an officer\u2019<\/span>s text messages made on a department-issued pager. The case arose when respondent, Jeff Quon, a police officer with the City of Ontario\u2019<\/span>s SWAT Team, exceeded his monthly messaging limit on a city-issued pager thereby causing the city to incur overage charges. After at least two other officers exceeded their monthly character allotment, the department audited two months worth of text messages to determine whether the department\u2019<\/span>s monthly plan was adequate. During the course of the audit, it was discovered that many of the messages sent by Quon were not work-related and some were of a sexual nature. Quon filed suit against the City of Ontario alleging violation of the\u00a0<\/span>Fourth Amendment and the Stored Communications Act (SCA).\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

The case presented the Court with an opportunity to address the issue of whether employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy in electronic communications made on employer-issued devices. However, the Court refused to make such a broad ruling stating that\u00a0<\/span>\u201c<\/span>the judiciary risks error by elaborating too fully on the Fourth Amendment implications of emerging technology before its role in society has become clear.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a>It assumed that the principles governing the search of an employee\u2019<\/span>s physical office space also apply to the search of electronic communications. As such, a search conducted for a non-investigatory, work-related purpose is reasonable where the search is \u201c<\/span>justified at its inception\u201d<\/span> and \u201c<\/span>not excessively intrusive.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/span>The Court concluded that the city\u2019<\/span>s search in Quon was reasonable<\/span><\/a>, because the city had legitimate work-related purposes for the search (i.e., to determine whether the monthly messaging limit was sufficient and whether the department was paying for excessive personal messaging). Moreover, the scope of the search was not excessively intrusive, because it was restricted to two months worth of work-hour messages.<\/p>\n

Although Quon only applies in a public employment context, there are lessons to be learned for employees in both the public and private sector.\u00a0<\/span>Here are a few precautions all employees should consider:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2022<\/span> Request a copy of your employer\u2019<\/span>s electronic communications policy and become familiar with its terms
\n\u2022<\/span> Assume that electronic communications on an employer-issued device are not private and may be reviewed
\n\u2022<\/span> Restrict your electronic communications to work-related activities<\/p>\n

If you do fall subject to a search, remember that your employer must have a work-related purpose and the search must be limited in scope. Should you have any questions regarding the legality of a search, do not hesitate to contact our\u00a0experienced\u00a0San Diego<\/a><\/span>\u00a0Labor Law Attorneys<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span>for an unbiased evaluation of your situation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds California Employer’s Search of Employee’s Text Messages On June 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[66,596],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2121","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-employees-privacy","category-new-employment-laws"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n