wp-paginate
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home5/californ/california-labor-law-attorney.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114updraftplus
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home5/californ/california-labor-law-attorney.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114wordpress-seo
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home5/californ/california-labor-law-attorney.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114<\/p>\n
The California Supreme court\u2019s long awaited decision in the Brinker case was a relief to employers and a cautionary tale to employees.<\/p>\n
Let\u2019s review what California law dictates then we\u2019ll discuss what the Brinker decision says about how that law should be applied.<\/p>\n
California Labor code 512<\/a>\u00a0states\u00a0that:<\/p>\n In the\u00a0Brinker case<\/a>\u00a0the court was tasked to decide what the employer’s role of responsibility was in ensuring that all of these requirements be met. More or less the court stated that employers are charged with the following tasks:<\/p>\n The decision also cleared up a common misconception that the employee must be given a break if working 5 hours. There is no rolling 5-hour rule. In other words, there\u2019s no penalty if an employee works 5 consecutive hours without a meal period (as the plaintiffs in Brinker argued). The Court asked for post-hearing briefing on this issue; it raised the specter that almost every employer in the state had a policy that was wrong.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s what we should take away from this decision:<\/p>\n Rules for meal periods:<\/p>\n The rules for rest breaks:<\/p>\n If you have any questions about this article or our blog, feel free to call us at:<\/p>\n Photo Credit: Shutterstock\/Eviart<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The California Supreme court\u2019s long awaited decision in the Brinker case was a relief to employers and a cautionary tale […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[267],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1816","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breaks"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n