Before the action is initiated, it’s always important to be cautious since the consequences might really take you to court unless your arguments are real and sound!

The following are tips for blowing the whistle in the workplace:
• Ensure that your family or a close friend is aware of your plan to start blowing the whistle.
• Seek backup by actually doing the research to establish other witnesses who are also disappointed with the same situation.
• It’s always wise to follow the ranks in the organization. If there is a criterion that should be followed then stick to it- start with the first level of authority then proceed onward if they prove to be unwilling to take action. Breaking ranks might really stir things up so you really need to have a clear mindset on this. You may end up with many cases with very intense public concerns and scrutiny!
• Your whistle-blowing should be reported in a timely manner to the government agencies. This will enable the employer to react to you rather than you reacting to the employer.
• Your relationships with the staff and the administration should be maintained! Remember its not a fight, it’s a plight!
• Ensure that every detail that unfolds before and after whistle-blowing is well recorded. This will actually help you as you seek pieces of evidence in instances of a lawsuit!
• All the relevant records and the supporting documents need to be copied before any concerns are raised.
• Isolation here may really not help you! Seek support from independent allies such as the journalist and the and the elected officials. It will be wise to reach for an activist too.
• You will need a competent lawyer for the event, so invest in this.
• Take care not to ruin the situation and embellish the charges.
• Your whistle-blowing process should be done with your own resources. Don’t use your employer’s resources.
• While working with the authorities, try not to be a cynic. You can still trust them even when you know there is something wrong.

Some frequently asked questions are:

1. Should I notify my employer before start whistle-blowing?
   The answer here is yes, depending on the reputation of the company. Some companies are so keen on the reputation and they will want to protect by all means. It’s good to notify them so that they may take appropriate action. whistle-blowing is only relevant when all other attempts have failed!
   2. What if you’re fired before you initiate?
   You can still take the action if the employer followed you with adverse situations concerning your account!

To conclude, the United Employees Law Group (UELG) are ready to protect the rights of the whistle blowers especially on the grounds of exploitation. File your case properly with all the details and you will surely get assisted in instances of improper termination or harassment by your employer!

The post Whistle Blowing in the Workplace appeared first on UELG.

California informant laws secure both open and private workers (not all states do), while occurrences of countering may likewise be charged as wrongdoings.

Why Is Whistleblower Law Important?

California’s informant law was reinforced in 2014 when three extra laws were ordered and added to the California Whistleblower Protection Act. The current law effectively precluded countering against a worker who reports infringement of state laws to an administration official or the police. One of the new laws grows this to likely incorporate the revealing of a speculated infringement inside the company or remotely to “any open body” leading to a hearing or examination.

Furthermore, California whistleblower law now expands this risk past the business to incorporate anyone following up for the benefit of the business (such an outsider administration contractual worker).

Likewise, California informant assurances secure laborers who unveil infringement, regardless of the possibility that doing as such is not some portion of their official occupation obligations.

Any individual who is qualified for security under California’s informant laws may likewise document a case for any harms supported by the defying the employer. This often incorporates reimbursement of lost wages; restoration; and here and sometimes to a harmed party (contingent upon the idea of the striking back). The workplace of the California State Auditor gives raw data on the best way to document a common dissension for infringement of state whistleblower laws.

What are Federal Whistleblower Laws? 

Before plunging into California’s whistleblower laws, it’s essential for California representatives to comprehend what government informant laws involve. Area 11(c) of the Government Occupational Health and Safety Act ensures representatives who are confronted with this circumstance.

Truth be told, “informants” are urged to advise the appropriate specialist when they have reason to believe their boss is disregarding the law or in the event that they are being made a request to abuse a law at work.

What is Whistleblower Retaliation? 

Government law restricts managers from retaliating or oppressing a worker for documenting a protest with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration regarding infringement of any workplace laws. If you report your manager for breaking the law, it is unlawful for them to rebuff you in any capacity.

There are basic ways that a business may counter against you for whistleblowing, and all are unlawful. These may include being avoided from workplace exercises, verbal abuse, being ignored, or meddling with your endeavors to locate a different place of employment. For whistleblowers, the most widely recognized types of opposition include wrongful termination, demotion, the opposition of advancement or an increase in salary, negative performance assessments, decrease of work hours, or badgering.

The post California Whistleblower Laws appeared first on UELG.

Whistleblowers are in charge of revealing 43 percent of all corporate and government misrepresentation, as indicated by a Price Waterhouse. This is more than the greater part of the extortion revealed by law authorization, and outside evaluators joined. Along these lines, whistleblowing assumes a vital part in keeping companies legitimate.

At the point when would it be a good idea for you to see yourself as a conceivable informant? The appropriate response is “when you can.” The sooner you recognize that you may have a whistleblowing circumstance, the better you can deal with your circumstance. If you are not on your toes, and you don’t secure yourself, you can wind up out of a vocation with no plan of action and no case.

Things being what they are, what would it be a good idea for you to do on the off chance that you trust your boss is damaging the law? The appropriate response is perplexing and relies on upon the reality of each case. In any case, a couple of general tenets may apply.

Stay alerted. Keep your eyes and ears open. If you get a correspondence that you accept is suggestive of unlawful action, make a composed note of it in a classified journal. On the off chance that you get messages that you accept reflect something illicit, make printed versions of the messages and place them in a protected place. You may require them later.

Consult with a lawyer. Consider reaching a lawyer promptly to decide whether the lead is unlawful, and, provided that this is true, how to report it adequately.

Consider making an informal complaint to your supervisor. Numerous directors are reputable and legit individuals. Numerous circumstances can be overseen by making a direct objection to your prompt manager. If you do make a verbal objection, made some record of it.

Use the Internal Hotline. Numerous companies have inward hotlines that you can use to make a complaint and for whistleblowing. These hotlines should be classified, however many are most certainly not. Numerous representatives make unknown protestations on the hotline and later discover that their directors or others in the administration know about the objection and who made it. Much of the time, the objection made on the hotline does not bring about any significant reaction by the business. Numerous hotlines are kept an eye on by outside contractual workers, or low-level HR staff.

Consider making a complaint to HR. On the off chance that the organization has a staff handbook, survey it to decide the methods you should use to make objections. On the off chance that the handbook teaches you to make your dissension to HR, consider placing it into composing Let’s face it-most HR offices exist to ensure the interests of the business, not to authorize your rights. Along these lines, you ought to view HR as “one and the same” as your boss. On the off chance that you set the objection in motion, be as particular as possible.

Do not tape record. Numerous workers trust that copying their bosses or chiefs amid private discussions is an awesome approach to “catch them.” However, by and large, it is illicit in California under Penal Code Section 632 to copy a private discussion. Truth be told, it’s a crime. So leave your recording device at home.

Photo Credit: Shutterstock/sirtravelalot

The post What to Know About Whistleblowing appeared first on UELG.

Labor attorneys fought long and hard over whether or not Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) protects oral, as well as written, complaints in Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. On March 22, 2011, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision; the Court held, in a 6-2 decision, that the anti-retaliation provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) protect oral, as well as written, complaints.

Labor attorneys had already won a suit against Saint-Gobain for placing time clocks in a location that did not allow workers the ability clock in prior to getting in and out of their gear, thus forcing them to work off the clock. Kasten filed an anti-retaliation suit against Saint-Gobain, alleging that Saint-Gobain terminated him for orally complaining about the location of the time clocks.

FLSA is probably better known for enforcing wage and hour issues such as overtime, working off the clock and reimbursable expenses, but it also forbids employers from terminating “any employee because such employee has filed any complaint alleging a violation of the statute.” The text of the FLSA was insufficient for the Court to interpret whether the term “filed” included oral complaints. Thus, the Court considered other factors, including:

• A wide interpretation of “filed” would be the same as the understanding of the National Labor Relations Act’s anti-retaliation provision
• A narrow interpretation would weaken the FLSA’s basic purpose – prohibiting detrimental labor conditions
• The EEOC and Secretary of Labor  have both decided that “filed” includes both oral and written complaints.
•  The FLSA’s requirement that an employer receive fair notice of a complaint can be met by oral and written complaints

California labor attorneys don’t commonly sue under FLSA because California’s Labor Code has its own anti-retaliation provision. California Labor Code section 1102.5:

(a) An employer may not make, adopt, or enforce any rule, regulation, or policy preventing an employee from disclosing information to a government or law enforcement agency, where the employee has reasonable cause to believe that the information discloses a violation of state or federal statute, or a violation or noncompliance with a state or federal rule or regulation.

(b) An employer may not retaliate against an employee for disclosing information to a government or law enforcement agency, where the employee has reasonable cause to believe that the information discloses a violation of state or federal statute, or a violation or noncompliance with a state or federal rule or regulation.

(c) An employer may not retaliate against an employee for refusing to participate in an activity that would result in a violation of state or federal statute, or a violation or noncompliance with a state or federal rule or regulation.

(d) An employer may not retaliate against an employee for having exercised his or her rights under subdivision (a), (b), or (c) in any former employment.

Nevertheless, the FLSA applies to California employers as well. Thus, California labor attorneys can now rely on Kasten to protect California employees from retaliation for oral complaints about FLSA-protected rights.

If you feel you have been retaliated against after making a complaint at work, be it verbal or written, contact United Employees Law Group to examine you case.

Photo Credit: Shutterstock/Kurhan

The post California Labor Law Attorneys have more Ammunition to Combat Retaliation appeared first on UELG.

The laws for whistleblowing in the United States encourage everyone to disclose information about illegal activities that they have witnessed or known about in their course of work. Through the intervention of the U.S. Congress, whistleblowers are all given protection against reprisals and are even encouraged to expose illegal acts that they know about by means of giving incentives and financial rewards.

The Whistleblower Protection Law

The whistle blower protection law generally states that “No company or any employee, officer, contractor or subcontractor, or even an agent of such company, may dismiss, suspend, demote, harass, threaten, or in any other way discriminate against a particular employee because of any lawful act performed by the employee”.

This enactment protects the rights of any employee who is courageous enough to report illegal actions of his employer against possible retaliation. This protection is highly essential for the federal government and other relevant agencies to learn about the unlawful acts or unethical practices of some corporations that they would have otherwise not been made aware of.

Constraints under the whistleblower protection law.

1. The law strictly covers employees for exposing illegal acts which are only within the company. However, various public policies might arise that could as well protect the employee from retaliation

2. If it turns out that the employer did not break any law by the perceived and reported acts, the employee is entitled to protection from retaliation only if he reasonably believed that the employer was committing an illegal act.

3. The whistleblower protection statute doesn’t cover retaliation from an employer for complaints that regard to personal loathe. The law restricts the use of personal grudges or political differences to file complaints against one’s employer. Under such circumstances, an employee won’t be protected by the whistle blower protection law.

Conclusion

If you believe that you hold certain information about illegal activities committed by government agencies, organizations, or companies, do not hesitate to seek the help of a professional litigator. There are many lawyers specializing in litigation for whistleblowing cases that can help and guide you through the process. Let the truth be known- not because of what you will get for telling the truth, but because telling the truth is right. Serve your country by keeping your eyes open and reporting all forms of fraud that may come to your attention. After all, the U.S. government is intent on taking care of people like you by offering incentives to you if the case is proven in court and over and above all; offering you protection against retaliation from your employer.

Photo Credit: Shutterstock/Suzanne Tucker

The post The Whistleblower Protection Law appeared first on UELG.

The employer may choose to retaliate. However, there is a raft of state and federal laws that shield whistleblowers from retaliation by the employer. For example, antidiscrimination laws, health and safety laws, wage and hour protections, etc. All these laws forbid employers to retaliate against a person who engages in conduct that the law protects.

Protected activities are defined by the specific law which creates the employee protection. There are laws that only protect complaints to a specific agency. Some state laws include a play fair’ provision that requires employees to warn the employers of the wrongdoing first before proceeding with any other action. This is to allow the employer to correct the problem. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees who participate in proceedings to enforce the law as well as proceedings opposing unfair discrimination. Filing a grievance, refusing to perform illegal duties, contacting the media, or doing anything to subvert illegal actions warrants to be considered protected activity.

However, it is noteworthy that some conduct may fall outside the scope of protected activity. For example, if you proceed to punch your supervisor after an argument on what is legal or illegal on the job, then that action is not protected. The key consideration is whether the employee’s behavior has overstepped the bounds of protected conduct.

After whistleblowing, as already stated, the employer may take an adverse employment action against the employee. An adverse employment action is any action that costs the employee money, according to some courts. For example, discharges, demotions, as well as denials of overtime, benefits and promotions are wont to cost the employee money, and, thus, they qualify as adverse employment actions. Other laws view any form of discrimination in the workplace as constituting an adverse employment action.

The tricky part is where you need to prove that it is your participation in a protected activity that caused the adverse action. There are two ways you can prove that the adverse action is a result of the protected activity: direct evidence or inference. You may have direct evidence that your boss retaliated because you reported a violation, or you can infer from the conduct that the protected activity caused the retaliation. The onus is on the employer to prove that the action could have arisen even without the protected activity.

The post Whistleblower Protection appeared first on UELG.